Skip to content
South Korea
File

South Korea: AI-generated false legal citations

This dossier follows South Korean courts’ findings on AI-fabricated citations and the institutional responses under consideration.

Last updated : 1 key moments

Where things stand

On 2 November 2026, the court administration released a survey of 360 judges. It is preparing recommendations on fabricated citations; no new fine is established as having taken effect.

South Korea: 80.7% of surveyed civil-case judges encountered AI-fabricated rulings

A survey released on 2 November 2026 by South Korea’s National Court Administration found that 80.7% of surveyed judges handling civil, family and administrative cases had encountered citations of nonexistent rulings linked to AI.

Flag of South Korea.
South Korean flag, geographical illustration; not a court hearing. — Wikimedia Commons — drapeau de la Corée du Sud, domaine public, rendu PNG.

The survey collected responses from 360 judges between 6 and 16 October. The quoted percentage concerns judges in those case categories; it measures neither the share of court cases affected nor all judges nationwide.

Documents also distorted real rulings or imitated the appearance of Supreme Court judgments. Problematic citations came from both litigants and lawyers.

The administration plans consultations and recommendations to Parliament to establish a legal basis for fines. Such penalties remain a proposal, rather than an already applicable measure.

Sources 4